HARO Statistics (2026)
Research
These figures come from HARO , Featured’s journalist-request network. Here is how those pitches are written, how journalists choose to receive them, and how requests and accounts are reviewed.
Findings
- “ More than one in five pitches submitted through HARO are written completely by AI — and journalists are about three times more likely to use a human-written pitch instead. ”
- HARO: Help A Reporter Out, Featured’s journalist-request network. Journalists publish requests for sources; sources reply with pitches.
- Pitch: A response a source sends to a journalist’s request. HARO classifies whether that response was written by a person or generated entirely by AI.
- AI-generated pitch: A pitch classified as written completely by AI, with no meaningful human authorship. Journalists can choose to block these when they submit a request.
- Journalist request: A query a journalist submits seeking sources, quotes, or expertise. Featured reviews the journalist, publication, and request before it is sent to sources.
- 21% One in five pitches is written entirely by AI More than one in five pitches submitted through HARO are written completely by AI.
- 35% A third of journalists now block AI-generated pitches More than one-third of journalists now choose to block AI-generated responses when submitting a request.
- 23 min A user is banned every 23 minutes HARO bans users primarily for spam and violations of its terms of service.
- 32% Nearly a third of journalist requests are rejected Nearly one-third of journalist requests are rejected during the approval process after reviewing the journalist, publication, and request for quality and legitimacy.
- ~3× Human-written pitches are far more likely to be used Human-written pitches are about three times more likely to be used by journalists than AI-generated pitches.
- Human-written pitches still win
- Journalists are about three times more likely to use a human-written pitch than an AI-generated one. More than a third now block AI-generated responses when they submit a request.
- Pitches. Pitch figures cover responses submitted through HARO. A pitch is counted as entirely AI-generated when the submission is classified as written completely by AI, with no meaningful human authorship. Use rates compare how often journalists use human-written pitches versus AI-generated pitches.
- Journalists. Journalist blocking is the share of journalists who opt to exclude AI-generated responses when they submit a request.
- Review. Ban frequency is the average interval between HARO account bans, issued primarily for spam and terms-of-service violations. Request rejection is the share of journalist requests declined during Featured’s approval review of the journalist, publication, and request for quality and legitimacy.
Related companies: Featured, Help a Reporter Out (HARO)
Source: featured.com/press/research/haro-statistics
Cite as: Featured / Brett Farmiloe, “HARO Statistics (2026)”.